[Bug 540761] Review Request: deja-dup - Simple backup tool and frontend for duplicity
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jan 15 20:00:14 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540761
Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tomspur at fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2010-01-15 15:00:08 EST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Once we have a better pool of packages in
> Vala, we would be able to determine the right path forward.
This seems to be a chicken or egg problem.
When you don't build from vala, the pool of packages in vala won't grow.
'When in doubt, build from the source that upstream is going to be modifying,
fixing bugs in directly, etc.'
(quoted from
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg01006.html )
should be the right thing.
Or do you have any other update from the packaging committee, I missed atm?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list