[Bug 553683] Review Request: luckybackup - A powerful, fast and reliable backup and sync tool

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 17 15:54:47 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553683

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen <thomasj at fedoraproject.org> 2010-01-17 10:54:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Issues: 
> 
> 1. Two of the desktop files here (the ones with -su in them) call: 
> 'su-to-root'. Where is that provided? Should we just not ship those? 
> Or change them to run a different way in Fedora?

I changed it completely. I use now consolehelper and run the application as
root in general.

> 2. 0.3.5 is out now. Can you update?

Sure, sorry. missed it. Fixed.

> 3. Does smp_mflags not work here? Might note that or add it to the make. 

I use smp_mflags. It's only qmake-qt4 that doesn't understand the
%{_smp_mflags} macro.

> 4. rpmlint says: 
> luckybackup.i586: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US rsync
> luckybackup.i586: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US customizable
> luckybackup.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US rsync
> luckybackup.src: W: spelling-error-in-description en_US customizable
> 
> Can be ignored. 
> 
> 5. Do you really need: 
> Requires:       qt-x11, qt
> It looks to me like the QT requirement is pulled in fine from the binary.    

Hah, you're right. Removed the Requires.
But i had to add a requires for usermode, due to rpmlint. Not sure if it's
really needed or if usermode/consolehelper is installed/used in any spin.

http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/luckybackup-0.3.5-1.fc12.src.rpm
http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/reviews/luckybackup.spec

-- 
Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list