[Bug 553483] Review Request: dogtag-pki-console-ui - The Dogtag PKI Console User Interface

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553483

--- Comment #7 from Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen at redhat.com> 2010-01-18 19:41:26 EST ---
Hi,
   I have looked into those -ui packages now and saw some strange source code
licensing. I see dogtag-pki-ra-ui, dogtag-pki-tps-ui, dogtag-pki-console-ui
tarballs and found same kind of file got licensed at one tarball as GPLv2 and
in other tarball as LGPLv2.
e.g.
head dogtag-pki-ra-ui-1.3.0/shared/docroot/ra/admin/console/config/header.vm
===> gave me GPLv2
head dogtag-pki-tps-ui-1.3.0/shared/docroot/tps/admin/console/config/header.vm
===> gave me LGPLv2

Do you see some kind of consistency should be there in upstream tarballs for
licensing of these files? I think I only got licensing issues and rest srpms
look ok to be approved. I only need feedback like do you want to change
upstream source licenses?  Otherwise with this suggested license tag, I will
approve reviews provided changes will be done at time of initial import of
these packages.

I also had discussion with nirik about licensing for these packages and got to
know, we should use license tag as "GPLv2 and LGPLv2", reason "someone could
take just one of the LGPLv2 files and use it in another project, with LPGL...".
So, the packages that I see need to be corrected are dogtag-pki-ra-ui,
dogtag-pki-tps-ui, dogtag-pki-console-ui, dogtag-pki-common-ui.

Thanks & Regards,
Parag

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.