[Bug 537979] Review Request: ghc-hashed-storage - Hashed file storage support

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537979

--- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen <petersen at redhat.com> 2010-01-21 04:29:24 EST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (Correctly he hasn't updated the original header file yet IIUC, but anyway.)    

So in that sense we could actually ignore GPL.

(In reply to comment #9)
> I think that makes it GPL AND BSD (whereas dual-licensed would be GPL OR BSD).

You're right about dual-licenseing being "OR", but AFAIK "AND"
means part of the binary package is one license and another part
another (cf cpphs).  In this case it is a single library linked
together and hence GPL trumphs BSD.

However going on the above comment from the author I think we could
just forget about the "GPL code" - I could add a comment to that
effect in the spec file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.