[Bug 557169] Review Request: bristol - Synthesizer emulator

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557169

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2010-01-22 06:10:04 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks, I made the configure, rpath and make changes.
> 
> I'm really not sure *what* to do with the libs, they're a run-time dependancy
> of the binaries and I'm not sure that anyone else will us them.  Does it make
> sense to have foo and foo-devel when they foo requires foo-devel?

If nothing requires the libs, it would be ok for me, to package them into the
main package (the versioned *.so.?.?.?). The other *.so and *.so.? should
indeed go into a -devel package.

Why do you package static libs?
(Better delete them completely.)

> Odd, how did you get it to crash?  The only trouble I have is if something else
> is creating a sound at that time and it can't open the sound device.  Otherwise
> I can startBristol -mini, for example, and play my little heart out. :)

"Try 'startBristol -b3' or 'startBristol -jack', for example, if you are
unsure."
So I started 'startBristol -jack' and it crashes on startup, or on clicking...

'startBristol -mini' works...

> 
> I'm torn on the .desktop file issue.  It'd be great to have one, maybe for
> -mini, but do startBristol -h and have a look at how many there are.  I'm not
> doing 20+ .desktop files.

I think, you should pick one as exapmle and start this with the desktop file.
e.g. -b3 (the upstream default one)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.