[Bug 551911] Review Request: monodevelop-boo - A boo plugin for monodevelop
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jan 24 17:34:49 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551911
Christian Krause <chkr at plauener.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |chkr at plauener.de
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Christian Krause <chkr at plauener.de> 2010-01-24 12:34:43 EST ---
I've roughly scanned over the package and I've seen a couple of issues. It
would be good if they could be fixed first before I do the full complete
review:
- source files differ from upstream:
sources in package:
25abd742dc4a0ffcf17c537dea6d791f SOURCES/monodevelop-boo-2.2.tar.bz2
sources from upstream:
56bf610e072030274309c94de1079b8e monodevelop-boo-2.2.tar.bz2
- the source URL does not match the link on the download page:
http://ftp.novell.com/pub/mono/sources/monodevelop-boo/monodevelop-boo-2.2.tar.bz2
- some rpmlint warnings:
SPECS/monodevelop-boo.spec:41: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
SPECS/monodevelop-boo.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4,
tab: line 14)
monodevelop-boo-devel.i686: E: description-line-too-long The
monodevelop-boo-devel package contains development files for monodevelop-boo.
- directory %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/BooBinding should be included in this
package:
e.g. use:
%files -f %{name}.lang
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/BooBinding
- License:
It looks like that the License should be rather GPLv2+ instead of MIT - please
can you have a look?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list