[Bug 556161] Review Request: sslscan - Security assesment tool for ssl

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 25 12:54:37 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556161

timlank <timlank at timlank.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timlank at timlank.com

--- Comment #2 from timlank <timlank at timlank.com> 2010-01-25 07:54:31 EST ---

Hi Michal, 

just trying to be of help again....

I performed the following:

rpm -Uvh sslscan-1.8.2-1.fc12.src.rpm
rpmbuild -ba sslscan.spec

and received the following output:

# rpmbuild -ba sslscan.spec
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LGjuMI
+ umask 022
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf sslscan-1.8.2
+ /usr/bin/gzip -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/sslscan-1.8.2.tgz
+ /bin/tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd sslscan-1.8.2
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (sslscan-makefile.patch):'
Patch #0 (sslscan-makefile.patch):
+ /bin/cat /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/sslscan-makefile.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .makefile --fuzz=0
+ echo 'Patch #1 (sslscan-patents.patch):'
Patch #1 (sslscan-patents.patch):
+ /bin/cat /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/sslscan-patents.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 -b --suffix .patents --fuzz=0
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file sslscan.c.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LGjuMI (%prep)


RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LGjuMI (%prep)


Looking at the patch reject file......

# cat sslscan.c.rej
***************
*** 985,991 ****
                                                                               
                        fprintf(options->xmlOutput, "   </pk>\n");
                                                                               
                }
                                                                               
                break;
                                                                               
        case EVP_PKEY_EC:
                                                                               
                printf("    EC Public Key:\n");
                                                                               
                if (options->xmlOutput != 0)
                                                                               
                        fprintf(options->xmlOutput, "   <pk error=\"false\"
type=\"EC\">\n");
--- 985,993 ----
                                                                               
                        fprintf(options->xmlOutput, "   </pk>\n");
                                                                               
                }
                                                                               
                break;
+                                                                              
        /* Comment out patented technology not enabled in Fedora */
+                                                                              
        /*
                                                                               
        case EVP_PKEY_EC:
                                                                               
                printf("    EC Public Key:\n");
                                                                               
                if (options->xmlOutput != 0)
                                                                               
                        fprintf(options->xmlOutput, "   <pk error=\"false\"
type=\"EC\">\n");

Thanks,
Tim

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list