[Bug 541072] Review Request: certmonger - certificate status monitor and PKI enrollment client

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jan 25 19:08:58 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541072

Rob Crittenden <rcritten at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Rob Crittenden <rcritten at redhat.com> 2010-01-25 14:08:55 EST ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock.
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM
+ rpmlint warns about Default-Start/Default-Stop in RPM but I agree with Nalin
that this is correct per the packaging guidelines: "More commonly, the service
does not start by default in any runlevel. In this case, the line should be
omitted."
+ source files match upstream (sha256sum)
0e1f0e966c17c2e6058ce7152cbb9d167ae42065ec9c45694ca7c75629ff98a8 
certmonger-0.17.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc files present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use consistent.
+ Compiler flags are honored correctly.
+ Package contains code.
+ no static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ no scriptlets are used.
+ Not a GUI app.
+ buildroot is cleaned in %install

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list