[Bug 523601] Review Request: swish-e - Simple Web Indexing System for Humans - Enhanced
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jan 27 11:07:52 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523601
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |panemade at gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> 2010-01-27 06:07:44 EST ---
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1947429
Suggestions:-
1) rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM.
perl-SWISH.i686: W: no-documentation
==> You should add README and Changes files too this package.
swish-e.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libswish-e.so.2.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.0
==> This should be notified to upstream that avoid using exit() in library
code.
swish-e.src:97: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/perl/*
swish-e.src:100: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*cgi
swish-e.src:102: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/swishspider
swish-e.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/swish-e/*pl
==> no issues for this.
swish-e-perl.i686: W: no-documentation
==> Here I can see README in prog-bin. Add it.
2) We don't add perl packages as Requires: as rpm/yum supposed to auto detect
dependencies and install them. So add them only if yum fails to auto-detect it.
3) you can move following
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo
$version))
to
perl-SWISH package.
For more information on perl packaging, you can look at perl specfile template.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list