[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630

--- Comment #37 from Chen Lei <supercyper at 163.com> 2010-01-28 13:14:42 EST ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> Well, I don't know which changelog you are talking about but the version jogl
> 1.1 tarball has both gluegen and jogl together. 
> You can create separate packages of them without any problems.
> If you are talking about jogl 2.0, it is still a dev version and there are
> several problems with it:
> * a lot of changes occurred in the API
> * the last modifications on jogl git are three months old.
> * there is not ETA on the release of a stable version (I tried a few time to
> contact upstream about that and about contributing to jogl but I never received
> any answer)
> For all these reasons, jogl 1.1 should be packaged first.

If so, I think we can create a jogl1 package instead of jogl to push jogl 1.1
to the fedora repo like qt3 and qt(qt4). What is the version of gluegen that
included in jogl 1.1 tarball?

> About the prerequirements, I don't know any dependencies of Scilab using
> jing.jar or jimi.jar ?!    

There is a Prerequirements to compile Scilab 5.2.0 from scilab's site.
See http://www.scilab.org/download/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.