[Bug 585719] Review Request: wxformbuilder - The OpenSource wxWidgets Designer, GUI Builder, and RAD Tool

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719

Terje Røsten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(terjeros at phys.ntn |
                   |u.no)                       |

--- Comment #16 from Terje Røsten <terjeros at phys.ntnu.no> 2010-07-02 15:47:41 EDT ---
Hi Alain, sorry about the delay. 

I started on a complete analyse of the license status.
That job was a bit more complicated than expected (still more surprises in this
package). Let's start with what I have so far.

 o sdk/tinyxml/
  -> seems to be a private copy of a lib already in Fedora, not allowed.

 o src/codegen/codeparser.h
   src/codegen/codeparser.cpp 
  -> no information about license, 

 o controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/RESearch.h
   controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/StyleContext.h 
  -> Public Domain

 o src/controls/include/wx/propgrid/*
   src/controls/include/wx/wxFlatNotebook/*
   src/controls/include/wx/wxScintilla/*    
  -> wxWindows license? is that GPLv2+?

 o src/controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/* a strange mix of 
   -> BSD, wxWin, Public Domain, GPLv2+?

Would be nice you could comment on this findings and contact upstream about
this fuzzy license status.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.