[Bug 610211] Review Request: unique3 - Single instance support for GTK3 applications

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=610211

--- Comment #10 from Chen Lei <supercyper1 at gmail.com> 2010-07-02 23:34:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> It is named this way for consistency with the unique package. 
> If you look at http://live.gnome.org/LibUnique, you will find equal amounts of
> references to libunique and unique.    

IMHO, I think unique should be renamed to libunique.

Upstream renamed tarball to libunique completely after version 1.0.6.

See 
1.0.4 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1058822
1.0.8 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1181378

I think it's more reasonable to rename this package to libunique or libunique3.

Also, only unique tarball is only available at
http://people.gnome.org/~ebassi/source/

Gnome site always use libunique as tarball name even on version 1.0.0.
See
http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GNOME/sources/libunique/1.0/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.