[Bug 191239] Review Request: qjackctl - Qt based JACK control application

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191239

David Timms <dtimms at iinet.net.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #26 from David Timms <dtimms at iinet.net.au> 2010-07-08 19:49:01 EDT ---
"""
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 6:04 PM, David Timms wrote:
> > On 08/07/10 09:31, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>> >> Â  Â  Â  On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 22:54 +1000, David Timms wrote:
>>> >>> Hi Fernando,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm interested in getting the packages I look after sorted for the epel
>>> >>> repo. qjackctl, while not being a Requires of rakarrack, definitely
>>> >>> makes it easy to work with jack applications like rakarrack.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Are you interested in creating/maintaining epel branches, or should I
>>> >>> make a cvs change request and build the current devel version for that ?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Also, I could look at grabbing those cvs fixes mentioned on
>>> >>> music at fedoraproject, unless you are already working/testing that ?
>> >>
>> >> Hi David... hmmm, probably you should contact Orcan as he is the current
>> >> maintainer of the Fedora qjackctl packages (he has been migrating a log
>> >> of packages from Planet CCRMA to Fedora). I'm sure he'll be happy to
>> >> help:
> > Hi Oget, what's your feeling toward epel ?
> >
> > I want build some audio bits for epel, but they have requirements like
> > this, thast aren't already branched for epel, so I'm willing to add them:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191239
> >
Hi David,
I am currently maintaining a considerably large number of packages,
both audio related and unrelated, in Fedora and RPMFusion. I don't
think I have time to get into EPEL. Also I don't have much interest in
EPEL. You can ask for a cvs request in the above bug for EPEL, if you
want to maintain it.

By the way,  you can also ask for pkgdb requests in Fedora branches.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/qjackctl

I'll approve them, as having comaintainers is always good :)

Orcan
"""

Accordingly, can the CVS request
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191239#c24 by actioned, please ?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.