[Bug 613697] Review Request: mingw32-libogg - The Ogg bitstream file format library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 12 16:22:11 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613697

--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com> 2010-07-12 12:22:10 EDT ---
+ rpmlint output
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines
+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines
+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
  BSD, and the native package is already in Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file
+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm
+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
  tried it on x86-64, cross-compiled to i386
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
+ %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
- no duplicate files in %files

  %{_mingw32_docdir}/libogg-%{version} is not needed, or if
  you want to include it, it must be marked %doc

+ %defattr line
n/a %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
+ header files should be in -devel
  this rule is not applicable for mingw32-* packages
+ static libraries should be in -static
  this rule is not applicable for mingw32-* packages
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
+ packages should not contain libtool .la files
  this rule is not applicable for mingw32-* packages
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8
+ use %global instead of %define

Optional:

n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
- reviewer should build the package in mock
- the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
+ scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin

Please fix the docdir thing mentioned above.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list