[Bug 611038] Review Request: python-anyjson - Wraps the best available JSON implementation available
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jul 15 05:44:46 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=611038
Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se> 2010-07-15 01:44:45 EDT ---
Fedora Review python-anyjson 2010-07-15
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint python-anyjson-0.2.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm
python-anyjson-0.2.4-1.fc12.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ Package is named according to guidelines
+ Specfile is named accordingly
+ The package license tag (BSD) is a Fedora approved license
+ The package license tag corresponds to the actual license of the sources
+ License file is included as %doc
+ Specfile is written in legible English
+ Source matches upstream:
$ md5sum anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz srpm/anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz
ed707033ad6cee0a44db199c289a4c80 anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz
ed707033ad6cee0a44db199c289a4c80 srpm/anyjson-0.2.4.tar.gz
+ Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2321200
+ BuildRequires are sane
+ No locales
+ No shares libraries
+ No bundled libraries
+ Package owns directories it creates
+ No duplicate files
+ Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr
+ Specfile uses macros consistently
+ Contains code
+ %doc is not runtime essential
+ No header files
+ No static libraries
+ No libtool archives
+ Package does not own other's directories
+ Installed files have valid UTF8 filenames
Package approved
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list