[Bug 615153] Review Request: tint2 - A lightweight X11 desktop panel and task manager

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615153

--- Comment #6 from Germán Racca <gracca at gmail.com> 2010-07-17 18:03:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)

Hello Ankur:

> Yes. I think that would be better.

Well...I'm not sure right now if it is better to package them separately,
because this version of tint2 has a config tool, called tint2conf, which once
opened it uses tintwizard.py to configure the theme.

But coming back to the license issue...is it not allowed to use a combination
of 2 licenses in a single package? Could you please clarify this to me? Because
in [1] says we can. If this is the case, I can package tint2 and tintwizard.py
together without any problem.

[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

> It still shouldn't call it a binary AFAIK. It's a python script. Although I may
> be wrong. I'd suggest asking upstream to make up a man page for tintwizard and
> include it in the distribution too. 

Certainly I could suggest upstream to add a man page for tintwizard.py, but I
don't think it is essential here because it is only a warning and to write a
man page could take a long time...

Ankur, again many thanks for your time, and I would like you to clarify my
doubts in order to go on with this package.

Regards,
German.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.