[Bug 615554] Review Request: minitunes - A better music player

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jul 17 22:14:56 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615554

Carl Thompson <fedora at red-dragon.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |fedora at red-dragon.com

--- Comment #2 from Carl Thompson <fedora at red-dragon.com> 2010-07-17 18:14:55 EDT ---
rpmlint opencc*
opencc.x86_64: W: invalid-license Apache
opencc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/opencc ['/usr/lib64']
opencc.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/opencc_dict
['/usr/lib64']
opencc.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man1
opencc.x86_64: W: empty-%post
opencc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Apache
opencc-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Apache
opencc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time,
Run-time, Runtish
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Apache
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libopencc.so.0.0.0
exit at GLIBC_2.2.5
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
opencc-libs.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib64/libopencc.so.0.0.0
opencc-libs.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib64/libopencc.so.0.0.0
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/opencc.mo
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_HK/LC_MESSAGES/opencc.mo
opencc-libs.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/opencc.mo
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 12 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list