[Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jul 19 08:41:47 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425

--- Comment #12 from manuel wolfshant <wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro> 2010-07-19 04:41:45 EDT ---
Only that now you install the CGI scripts below /var/www/html/lightsquid, but
the /var/www/html path is not owned by anyone.

To cut it short
- you either need to Require: httpd (in order to have an onwer for
/var/www/html)
or
- create the -apache subpackage as you have done in the initial spec, BUT do it
correctly ( move CGI scripts and apache's config to it + Require: httpd).

In my opinion requiring httpd by the log parser is not really a good idea,
squid and httpd can very well run on different machines. Admins may choose to
install the main package ( i.e. log parser) on the box running squid and
transfer the resulted html pages to another box where a webserver ( not
necessarily httpd -- I for one use lighttpd) runs

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list