[Bug 603233] Review Request: zeromq - Software library for fast, message-based applications

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603233

--- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-20 08:48:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> 2.I suggest to move {_bindir}/* and %{_mandir}/man1/* to -utils subpackages as
> Peter's spec in Bug 459874, many packages only depend on the shlib.    

Done.

To the splitting of man pages:
e.g. zmq_inproc refers to zmq_bind, which was not in the same package. That
doesn't make much sence so me, so I moved any man page to the devel package.

This way the main package is as small as possible and everyone, who is
interessted in getting information would call 'man zmq'. But zmq.7.gz talks
about how to include <zmq.h> and so on, which is only usefull, when having the
-devel package around...

I don't see another reason for keeping a man page at all in the main package.
You?

Another issue:
I'm unsure about the group of -utils. Development/Tools would be the best,
isn't it? (can't find Peter's spec file anymore)

$ rpmlint ./zeromq-2.0.7-3.fc13.src.rpm x86_64/zeromq-*
zeromq-utils.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US zmq -> Zama, zoom,
Zarqa
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.


Spec URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zeromq.spec
SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zeromq-2.0.7-3.fc13.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.