[Bug 617524] New: Review Request: tidyp - Clean up and pretty-print HTML/XHTML/XML

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: tidyp - Clean up and pretty-print HTML/XHTML/XML

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617524

           Summary: Review Request: tidyp - Clean up and pretty-print
                    HTML/XHTML/XML
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: paul at city-fan.org
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/tidyp/branches/fedora/tidyp.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/tidyp/tidyp-1.02-2.fc14.src.rpm

Description:
tidyp is a fork of tidy on SourceForge. The library name is "tidyp", and the
command-line tool is also "tidyp" but all internal API stays the same.

The fork was made because the upstream "tidy" project simply doesn't make
releases and working with VCS snapshots is difficult for downstream consumers.
The main consumer of "tidyp" is perl-HTML-Tidy, where the "tidyp" version is
required from version 1.50 onwards (it won't work with plain "tidy").

The upstream repository for "tidyp" contains the documentation forked from
"tidy" but this isn't yet included in the release tarballs. I've asked upstream
to include this in future releases, which will result in the manpage for
"tidyp" and API documentation for "libtidyp" being included in the package,
which currently is not the case.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.