[Bug 618761] Review request: Gold Allocation Manager for HPC
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jul 28 09:45:10 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=618761
--- Comment #4 from Jessica Jones <fedora at zaniyah.org> 2010-07-28 05:45:08 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
<snip>
> [!] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
<snip>
> === COMMENTS ===
>
> Only the LICENSE file should be included in all the %doc stansas. (the rest
> should be based on what's appropriate, normally just the main package)
>
> While the spec file is legible, it's supposed to be en_US
> timeframe -> time frame, time-frame
Is there some way to check this sort of thing (I am finding conflicting
sources)? I copied the description from the website, which is in US English as
far as I know.
> file-not-utf8 (LICENSE, README)
> # standard fix (preserving timestamps)
> iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf8 README >README.utf8
> touch -r README README.utf8
> mv README.utf8 README
Do you want me to add that to the spec file?
> Ignore the lack of man-page messages, upstream don't provide them and there is
> other documentation.
>
> non-conffile-in-etc (/etc/gold(|g|d).conf
> - Use the %conf macro
>
> macro-in-comment
> - Ignore,
>
Okay will do.
> Is there a make test rule (that doesn't require a database)? If so it *should*
> be used.
No there isn't. I already looked into this, and there isn't a make check
either. I have been talking to the upstream maintainer off-list about this and
other issues, so it may appear later.
> It's worth running a recent rpmlint over all the files before submitting, the
> EL-5 rpmlint is rather out of date.
It would be nice if the people.fedoraproject.org servers had the koji client
and rpmlint (and rpmbuild for creating SRPMs) on them. I will have to spend
some time setting up a VM so that I can use it to build otherwise.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list