[Bug 617592] Review Request: libaccounts-qt - Library for handling the account storage

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=617592

--- Comment #3 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking at uos.de> 2010-07-30 10:10:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I suggest to call it accounts-qt
I think you meant libaccounts-qt here. 
In this special case and because of its companion package libaccounts-glib,
naming the package libaccounts-qt is probably OK.


> libaccounts-qt also provides .qch docs which is used by assitant. Install .qch
> files to version doc directories is unacceptable which will break bookmarks
> when updating libaccounts-qt. It may be better to simply delete html docs which
> provides the same contents with .qch files.
> 
> What's your opinion?

I would tend to remove the qch docs and go with html only, as it's the more
common format especially for API docs. I don't think most developers would
prefer qch over html but might miss the latter. Splitting qch and html docs to
different directories is also a bad idea. Thus, I would simply drop the qch
file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.