[Bug 619383] Review Request: gsettings-desktop-schemas - A collection of GSettings schemas
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jul 30 15:53:47 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=619383
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-07-30 11:53:45 EDT ---
Some notes:
* EVR
- For versioning, please use "0.0.1-Y.gitXXXXXXXX%{?dist}"
as described in the below (this versioning method is much
safer)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages
* BuildRoot
- is no longer used on Fedora (EPEL5 and below still uses, however I
don't think this package will be imported there)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* noarch handling
- Maybe you want to use "%configure --libdir=%{_datadir}".
* Timestamps
- Please consider to use
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
This method usually works on Makefiles generated by recent
autotools.
* %clean
- %clean section is no longer needed on Fedora 13 and above
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
(and I think this pakage is needed only for F-14+).
* %postun, %posttrans
- Maybe this is better?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-May/007065.html
(I don't know the current status of packaging guideline proposal
about gsettings)
By the way Requires(postun) or so is needed for this?
* Directory ownership issue
- %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/ is owned by glib2 and
it seems "Requires: glib2 (>= 2.25.x)" is needed for main
package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list