[Bug 471805] Review Request: aespipe - AES-based encryption tool for tar/cpio and loop-aes images

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471805

Kai Engert (kaie) <kengert at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |Reopened
             Status|CLOSED                      |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |kengert at redhat.com
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |kengert at redhat.com

--- Comment #13 from Kai Engert (kaie) <kengert at redhat.com> 2010-07-31 16:19:08 EDT ---
Reopening.

I see a new release 
http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/aespipe/aespipe-v2.4b.tar.bz2

I fixed the whitespace warning and uploaded
http://kuix.de/fedora/aespipe/aespipe-2.4b-1.fc13.src.rpm

I built it, and no longer get any executable stack warnings.
$ rpmlint aespipe-2.4b-1.fc13.i686.rpm 
aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) cpio -> CPI, Scipio, campion
aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) aes -> eyes, sea, ae
aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI, Scipio,
campion
aespipe.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US loopback -> loop back,
loop-back, loophole
aespipe.i686: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.3e-4 ['2.4b-1.fc13',
'2.4b-1']
aespipe.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary bz2aespipe
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

http://kuix.de/fedora/aespipe/aespipe-2.4b-1.fc13.i686.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.