[Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 1 18:41:08 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-01 14:41:06 EDT ---
For -2:
* For
- Directory ownership of %geminstdir, %gemdir/doc,
and "Changes THANKS TODO VERSION", please my comments
on bug 598138.
* Examples
- For example,
-------------------------------------------------------
$ ruby -rubygems ./examples/tclock.rb
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
`gem_original_require': no such file to load -- ncurses (LoadError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
from ./examples/tclock.rb:33
-------------------------------------------------------
Actually these example files (in -doc subpackage) all has
'require ncurses(.rb)', however actually the installed ruby
script (in main package) is "ncursesw.rb".
So these example files should be modified as such (I am not sure
if we can create symlink as "ncurses.rb -> ncursesw.rb", because
there is another "ncurses-0.9.1.gem" actually - although ncurses.gem
seems the older version of ncursesw.gem)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list