[Bug 597709] Review Request: rubygem-ncursesw - Hacked up version of ncurses gem

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 1 18:41:08 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597709

Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-01 14:41:06 EDT ---
For -2:

* For
  - Directory ownership of %geminstdir, %gemdir/doc,
    and "Changes THANKS TODO VERSION", please my comments
    on bug 598138.

* Examples
  - For example,
-------------------------------------------------------
$ ruby -rubygems ./examples/tclock.rb 
/usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in
`gem_original_require': no such file to load -- ncurses (LoadError)
 from /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `require'
 from ./examples/tclock.rb:33
-------------------------------------------------------
    Actually these example files (in -doc subpackage) all has
    'require ncurses(.rb)', however actually the installed ruby
    script (in main package) is "ncursesw.rb".

    So these example files should be modified as such (I am not sure
    if we can create symlink as "ncurses.rb -> ncursesw.rb", because
    there is another "ncurses-0.9.1.gem" actually - although ncurses.gem
    seems the older version of ncursesw.gem)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list