[Bug 588941] Review Request: pypy - Implementation of the Python language, using Python itself

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588941

--- Comment #7 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com> 2010-06-02 12:56:31 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)

> a) Fixed by using 'and': 
> 
> pypy.src: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable
> pypy-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable
> pypy-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable
> pypy-nojit.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable
> pypy-sandbox.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable
> pypy-stackless.x86_64: W: invalid-license MIT, PSL, LGPL, Distributable
>
A few things to note here:

Distributable is not a valid license tag.  You'll need to figure out what it
really is.  If it's some piece of code that's not modifiable, it might be that
it doesn't fit the OSS Guidelines :-(  If it's firmware, then it's okay but you
still need to figure out the proper license.  Details here:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing

And you can ask spot if you're in a grey area.

As for listing of licenses... if this is an and situation, you might need to
ask spot how things need to be licensed.  LGPL tends to trump all the other
licenses but since this package has so many parts, you might need to talk to
spot to determine the actual situation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.