[Bug 601408] Review Request: techtalk-pse - Presentation software designed for technical people

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 8 10:57:23 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601408

Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |tomspur at fedoraproject.org
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |tomspur at fedoraproject.org
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Spura <tomspur at fedoraproject.org> 2010-06-08 06:57:18 EDT ---
Nice program...


Review:

Good:
- name ok
- license ok
- group ok
- no libs
- no *.la
- arch ok
- BR ok
- %prep ok
- %build ok
- $ rpmlint ./noarch/techtalk-pse-1.0.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
./techtalk-pse-1.0.0-1.fc13.src.rpm 
techtalk-pse.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preloaded ->
reloaded, p reloaded, freeloaded
techtalk-pse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US preloaded ->
reloaded, p reloaded, freeloaded
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
- builds in koji:
  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2237781



Needswork:
- better use %{version} in URL
- could you please use INSTALL="install -p" when installing?
- please include the example in %doc, I didn't found a good starting point
online, except the man page an this one example


#############################################################################

The issues are all SHOULD.

#############################################################################

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list