[Bug 600637] Review Request: gnome-js-common - Common modules for GNOME JavaScript interpreters
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 10 20:58:43 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600637
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-06-10 16:58:39 EDT ---
Well, as some Japanese people said that it was said that
his favorite "Same Gnome" disappeared, I will review this...
Simple package. Some notes
* noarch handling
----------------------------------------------------
%patch1 -p1 -b .license
%build
# not using standard configure macro. Nothing is compiled,
# only prefix needed
./configure --prefix %{_prefix}
----------------------------------------------------
- Why don't you just use the following?
----------------------------------------------------
%configure --libdir=%{_datadir}
----------------------------------------------------
* Timestamps
- Trying to keep timestamps on installed files is appreciated
especially because this is based on recent autotools method
and this is noarch. Please consider to use below:
----------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
----------------------------------------------------
* Cleanups
- rpmlint may complain, however:
* On Fedora BuildRoot tag is no longer used:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
* On Fedora 13+, %clean is not needed:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25clean
And I guess you need this package only for F-13+.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list