[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 14 10:19:43 UTC 2010

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


--- Comment #23 from Adam Tkac <atkac at redhat.com> 2010-06-14 06:19:37 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Well, nonetheless, you *are* going to get push-back if you remove the static
> library.  I know because it was tried once already, and not that long ago.  See
> bug #186060, bug #215537.  Fedora is used for other things than just building
> itself.    

In my opinion it's long time since F7 (libjpeg-turbo will hit F14) so we can
"retest" if someone still needs the static libjpeg. I would rather see no
static libjpeg.a for now. It might be easily added in the future if someone
requests it, libjpeg-turbo project uses libtool so I will drop the
"--disable-static" configure flag in the specfile and add -static subpackage,
it's pretty simple. If we package -static libjpeg now we won't be able to
figure time when we can say "noone uses the static libjpeg.a".

Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

More information about the package-review mailing list