[Bug 593841] Review Request: wicd - Wireless and wired network connection manager

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 14 18:36:46 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841

leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(leigh123linux at goo |fedora-review+
                   |glemail.com)                |

--- Comment #31 from leigh scott <leigh123linux at googlemail.com> 2010-06-14 14:36:39 EDT ---
Package Review
==============

Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated

=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x]  Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]  Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]  Package meets the Packaging Guidelines.
[x]  Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported architecture.
Tested on: F13 x86_64
[x]  Rpmlint output:

rpmlint  wicd-1.7.0-1.fc13.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint wicd-1.7.0-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
wicd.x86_64: E: no-binary
wicd.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.

rpmlint wicd-common-1.7.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
wicd-common.noarch: E: incoherent-logrotate-file /etc/logrotate.d/wicd
wicd-common.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name wicd ('wicd-common',
'wicd-commond')
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.

rpmlint wicd-curses-1.7.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint wicd-gtk-1.7.0-1.fc13.noarch.rpm
wicd-gtk.noarch: W: no-documentation
wicd-gtk.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/xdg/autostart/wicd-tray.desktop
wicd-gtk.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wicd-gtk
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.




[x]  Package is not relocatable.
[x]  Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id
-u -n))
[x]  Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]  License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: GPLv2+
[x]  If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x]  Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]  Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package    : 7e5956891d6696b6185baa7f5dc70c56  wicd-1.7.0.tar.bz2
MD5SUM upstream package: 7e5956891d6696b6185baa7f5dc70c56  wicd-1.7.0.tar.bz2
[x]  Package is not known to require ExcludeArch, OR:
Arches excluded:
Why:
[x]  All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]  The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]  ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]  Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]  Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]  Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]  Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]  Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
[x]  Package consistently uses macros.
[x]  Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-]  Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]  Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]  Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-]  Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present.
[-]  Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present.
[-]  Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]  Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[x]  Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la).
[x]  Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x]  Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.

=== SUGGESTED ITEMS ===
[x]  Latest version is packaged.
[x]  Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]  Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]  Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2250049
[x]  Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
Tested on: i686 & x86_64
[x]  Package functions as described.
[x]  Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]  The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]  File based requires are sane.




================
*** APPROVED ***
================

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list