[Bug 564518] Review Request: monodevelop-python - Python bindings for monodevelop
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 15 15:52:17 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564518
Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel at natemccallum.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ian at ianweller.org,
| |nathaniel at natemccallum.com
--- Comment #1 from Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel at natemccallum.com> 2010-06-15 11:52:15 EDT ---
[ OK ] specfiles match:
[ OK ] source files match upstream:
[ OK ] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[ OK ] spec is properly named, cleanly written, and uses macros consistently.
[ OK ] dist tag is present.
[ FAIL ] build root is correct.
Use: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
[ FAIL ] license field matches the actual license.
License appears to actually be MIT, not GPLv2+
[ OK ] license is open source-compatible.
[ FAIL ] license text included in package.
Please include a LICENSE file in %doc
[ FAIL ] latest version is being packaged.
2.3.1 is available, does it build against Fedora's monodevelop?
[ FAIL ] BuildRequires are proper.
One dep per line is preferred.
[ OK ] compiler flags are appropriate.
[ OK ] %clean is present.
[ ?? ] package builds in mock.
[ OK ] package installs properly.
[ OK ] debuginfo package looks complete.
[ FAIL ] rpmlint is silent.
monodevelop-python.src:50: E: files-attr-not-set
monodevelop-python.src:10: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 4,
tab: line 10)
monodevelop-python.x86_64: E: no-binary
monodevelop-python.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
monodevelop-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation
monodevelop-python-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Put %defattr(-,root,root,-) under %files devel
Include LICENSE in both packages
Fix whitespace
"E: no-binary" can probably be ignored.
[ OK ] final provides and requires are sane
[ OK ] %check is present and all tests pass:
[ OK ] no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
[ FAIL ] owns the directories it creates.
You should probably do:
%dir %{_libdir}/monodevelop/AddIns/PyBinding
[ OK ] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[ OK ] no duplicates in %files.
[ OK ] file permissions are appropriate.
[ OK ] scriptlets match those on ScriptletSnippets page.
[ OK ] code, not content.
[ OK ] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
[ OK ] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
[ OK ] no headers.
[ OK ] no pkgconfig files.
[ OK ] no libtool .la droppings.
[ OK ] desktop files valid and installed properly.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list