[Bug 598688] Review Request: archivemount - FUSE based filesystem for mounting compressed archives

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Jun 24 16:36:37 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688

--- Comment #6 from Niels de Vos <ndevos at redhat.com> 2010-06-24 12:36:35 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I recommend that you ask upstream to clarify the license in the source code
> header. Until they reply, the license tag should reflect the license header in
> the source code: GPL+.    

I have contacted the author and archivemount-0.6.1.tar.gz has been released to
resolve the license issue. It is definitely LGPLv2+. I got a confirmation by
email, but that is in German, so I wont share it here.

The latest .spec and SRPM can be downloaded here:
- http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount
- http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount.spec
-
http://nixpanic.net/software/packages/archivemount/archivemount-0.6.1-1.fc13.src.rpm

$ rpmlint archivemount.spec 
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint archivemount-0.6.1-1.fc13.src.rpm 
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystem -> file system,
file-system, systematic
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib
archive, lib-archive, archive
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gz -> g, z, gs
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bz -> bx, b, z
archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US filesystem -> file
system, file-system, systematic
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.


Cheers,
Niels

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list