[Bug 608066] New: LDC a compiler for the D programming language

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 25 15:05:53 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: LDC a compiler for the D programming language

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066

           Summary: LDC a compiler for the D programming language
           Product: Fedora
           Version: 13
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: bioinfornatics at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec url:
http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/ldc.spec

src.rpm url:
http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/ldc-0.9.2-1.20100706hg1653.fc13.src.rpm


$ rpmlint -i SPECS/ldc.spec 
SPECS/ldc.spec:66: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/.empty
A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It
should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}.

SPECS/ldc.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ldc-20100706hg1653.tar.xz
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.

0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
_____________________________________________________________________________

$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/ldc-0.9.2-1.20100706hg1653.fc13.src.rpm => wrong misspeling
warning
_____________________________________________________________________________

$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/ldc-* ==> wrong misspeling warning and :
ldc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldc
ldc.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldmd

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list