[Bug 608141] Review Request: atkmm - C++ interface for the ATK library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608141

--- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember <kalev at smartlink.ee> 2010-06-28 02:59:36 EDT ---
It's not a good idea to rely on atk-devel having Requres: gtk-doc. What if, for
example, they move documentation to -doc subpackage and Requres: gtk-doc also
moves over there?

I feel it's more correct for atkmm-devel to directly depend on gtk-doc (or any
other package providing these directories); it's not safe to rely on atk-devel
to require the correct package.

Anyway, perhaps we should take this to FPC mailing list instead. As you pointed
out, since atk-devel already has gtk-doc dep, then dropping the dep only in
atkmm-devel and leaving it in place for atk-devel will still pull in gtk-doc;
this is something that needs to be fixed in every package in the distro.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.