[Bug 609320] Review Request: grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts - Proggy Tiny with slashed zero programming font

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609320

Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur at gmail.com> 2010-06-30 03:52:32 EDT ---
Hi,

(In reply to comment #4)
> Should be all here:
> 
> ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec
> ftp://ftp.rexursive.com/pub/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts/grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts-1.0-2.fc13.src.rpm
> 
> rpmlint output:
> 
> [bojan at shrek SPECS]$ rpmlint grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec
> grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
> grimmer-proggy-tinysz-fonts.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
> 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
> 
> But I guess that should be OK, because it's not longer required. I'm thinking,
> maybe we should keep that after all - in case we branch to EPEL etc. It can't
> hurt, right?    

Yeah, it will simply be ignored. 

Issues are fixed. You're good to go. 

XXXX APPROVED XXXX

Please continue from 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a

regards,
Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.