[Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Mar 9 16:14:09 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630

--- Comment #84 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior <henriquecsj at gmail.com> 2010-03-09 11:14:01 EST ---
Hi, sorry for the delay, but I'm a little sick this days.
As you can see, I've updated gluegen to build a package named gluegen-source.
By doing this, I'm, now, able to build jogl without gluegen side by side and my
spec now BuildRequires: gluegen-source. I've made a patch to point my build.xml
to the correc (and new) location of gluegen.
Despite the fact that my local copy of jogl builds ok, I'm having problems with
my rpmbuild version:

BUILD FAILED
/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:1562: The following error
occurred while executing this line:
/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/jogl/make/build.xml:487: The following error
occurred while executing this line:
/usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:458: The following error
occurred while executing this line:
/usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/build.xml:378: The following error
occurred while executing this line:
/usr/share/gluegen-source/gluegen/make/gluegen-cpptasks.xml:394: Problem:
failed to create task or type compiler
Cause: The name is undefined.
Action: Check the spelling.
Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared.
Action: Check that any <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken place.


Total time: 4 seconds
erro: Status de saída de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.lV0Zq0 inválido (%build)

That is weird... one version builds and another not.


spec: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/jogl.spec
srpm: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/jogl/1.1.1/2/fix-buildxml.patch

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list