[Bug 523877] Review Request: CBFlib - crystallography binary format library

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523877

--- Comment #15 from Chen Lei <supercyper at 163.com> 2010-03-11 00:58:52 EST ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > (In reply to comment #12)
> > > Here's the updated 0.9.0 version:
> > > Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib.spec
> > > SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/CBFlib-0.9.0-1.fc12.src.rpm
> > > I also included some of the bin programs, but I'm wondering if it would be best
> > > to prepend "cbf" to them, as names like "convert_image" are a bit ambiguous and
> > > potentially conflicting.
> > > I didn't split off -doc and -utils, I'd like to get some feedback from fedora
> > > review people on that.    
> > 
> > Please do not add utils to main package, it'll lead to multilib conflict.    
> How will it lead to a multilib conflict? Its fine to install both the 32 and 64
> bit binaries and libraries and run/use either.    

Hi Tim,

See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks#Splitting_libraries_into_separate_packages

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.