[Bug 571502] Review Request: pidgin-birthday-reminder - Birthday Reminder plugin for Pidgin
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 11 09:26:03 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571502
--- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember <kalev at smartlink.ee> 2010-03-11 04:25:59 EST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Thanks for the review, William.
> * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
> create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
> create that directory. [13]
>
> is "# Pidgin package doesn't own sounds/pidgin/ dir" a bug against pidgin?
No, I don't think it's pidgin's bug. That comment in the spec file is just a
reminder for myself why I had to own this directory. On pidgin's point of view,
there is no reason why pidgin should own this dir: it doesn't place any files
in there, and also it's not a standard directory where plugins would put stuff.
So right now I think it's best if pidgin-birthday-reminder owned this dir.
> * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [17]
>
> changing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT to %{buildroot} for consitancy would improve
> consistency
According to [1], choosing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT vs %{buildroot} is left entirely up
to the packager. What matters is that $RPM_BUILD_ROOT should not be mixed with
%{buildroot} in one spec.
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
> * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should
> contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [29]
>
> are translations available?
No, none are available.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list