[Bug 526916] Review Request: orc - The Oil Runtime Compiler

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 25 23:35:48 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526916

--- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart at gmail.com> 2010-03-25 19:35:43 EDT ---
Do we know if this package can build fine on AMD CPU?

At least testsuite fails with my X2 4200+ , whereas it worked in the builder:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2076254

--------------
8:
  retq
/* compover inplace 4,4,4 */
/* compovera inplace 1,1,1 */
/* compadd inplace 4,4,4 */
XFAIL: exec_opcodes_pixel
====================
1 of 11 tests failed
====================
make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Erreur 1
make[4]: quittant le répertoire «
/home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/orc-0.4.3/testsuite »
make[3]: *** [check-am] Erreur 2
make[3]: quittant le répertoire «
/home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/orc-0.4.3/testsuite »
make[2]: *** [check-recursive] Erreur 1
make[2]: quittant le répertoire «
/home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/orc-0.4.3/testsuite »
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Erreur 1
make[1]: quittant le répertoire « /home/builder/rpmbuild/BUILD/orc-0.4.3 »
make: *** [check] Erreur 2
--------------

That's probably out of the scope of F-13, but ppc64 at least is failing:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2076263
I don't know if it worth to handle this, given that it's now a secondary arch
in Fedora.

Do we have more feeback on the library size ?

I will do run-time tests with the Schrodinger update tomorrow.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the package-review mailing list