[Bug 589471] Review Request: perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP - POE Component providing TCP server services for test cases

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri May 7 10:37:06 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589471

Yanko Kaneti <yaneti at declera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti <yaneti at declera.com> 2010-05-07 06:37:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Remove this, MODULE_COMPAT it's enough -> BuildRequires:  perl >= 1:5.6.0

For this I've decided to stay with the Perl packaging guidelines for now. 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Versioned_MODULE_COMPAT__Requires
Once they are revised some automated tool would probably be used to remove that
line for all modules.

> Also do you need all requires? Don't they needed only as BuildRequires?

It doesn't seem the perl autorequires work for usage declarations like the one
that can be found in /usr/share/perl5/Test/POE/Server/TCP.pm

use POE qw(Wheel::SocketFactory Wheel::ReadWrite Filter::Line);

If not explicitly declared the built package ends without requirements for
these.
I've only removed the superfluous BuildRequires:  perl(POE::Filter)

> Change PERL_INSTALL_ROOT to DESTDIR, because this bug wasn't still removed from
> cpanspec ;-)

Done

> None of these are blockers. Please fix it before upload.
> 
> ACCEPTED    

Thanks!

New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP
Short Description: POE Component providing TCP server services for test cases
Owners: yaneti
Branches: F-13
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list