[Bug 592387] Review Request: maven-install-plugin - Maven Install Plugin

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon May 17 11:22:58 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592387

--- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako at redhat.com> 2010-05-17 07:22:53 EDT ---
Review:

OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. OUTPUT:

maven-install-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation
maven-install-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/maven/fragments/maven-install-plugin
maven-install-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
maven-install-plugin-2.3.tar.gz

Not a problem. 

OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
OK: Each package must consistently use macros.
OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadocs
subpackage.
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. 
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

One small problem only:
install -pm 644 pom.xml \
    %{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP.%{name}.pom 
should be
install -pm 644 pom.xml \
    %{buildroot}%{_mavenpomdir}/JPP-%{name}.pom

This is needed for proper finding of the pom.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list