[Bug 597632] New: Review Request: SOPE - web app framework used by SOGo groupware
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat May 29 21:57:27 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: SOPE - web app framework used by SOGo groupware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597632
Summary: Review Request: SOPE - web app framework used by SOGo
groupware
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: havardw at pvv.org
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
http://www.pvv.org/~havardw/files/fedora/sope-4.9.0.0_20100529svn-1.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.pvv.org/~havardw/files/fedora/sope-4.9.0.0_20100529svn-1.fc13.src.rpm
Description: SOPE is a web app framework in Objective-C. This is a dependency
for SOGo (Scalable OpenGroupware.org), which I'll create another review request
for shortly.
The spec file is based on the upstream spec file, and cleaned up to (hopefully)
meet Fedora standards. I've kept the division in sub-packages to keep closer to
upstream, but will be willing to reduce the number of sub-packages if that
should be a requirement.
rpmlint:
> rpmlint -iv ~/build/SPECS/sope.spec
/home/havardw/build/SPECS/sope.spec:248: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options
must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script
supports it.
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
> rpmlint ~/build/RPMS/x86_64/sope*20100529*
sope-appserver.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-appserver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-appserver-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wod
sope-appserver-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-appserver-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xmlrpc_call
sope-appserver-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary sope-4.9
sope-core.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US io -> oi, Io, ii
sope-core.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-gdl1.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-gdl1.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary load-EOAdaptor
sope-gdl1.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary connect-EOAdaptor
sope-gdl1-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-gdl1-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-gdl1-postgresql.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-gdl1-sqlite.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-ical.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iCalendar -> i
Calendar, calendar, calender
sope-ical.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vCard -> v Card,
card, Cardin
sope-ical.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-ical-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-ldap.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-ldap-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dsml -> dismal,
dismay, damsel
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dsml -> dismal,
dismay, damsel
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US login -> loin,
logic, lo gin
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldapls
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldapchkpwd
sope-ldap-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldap2dsml
sope-mime.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-mime-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-xml.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-xml-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-xml-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation
sope-xml-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary domxml
sope-xml-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xmln
sope-xml-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary saxxml
21 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 37 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list