[Bug 648633] Review Request: python-sphinx10 - Python documentation generator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 2 07:55:53 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648633

--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim <fedora at michelsylvain.info> 2010-11-02 03:55:52 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> *.po files are a source file, *.mo files are what's actually used so we want to
> exclude them.  I noticed that you also included the *.js translations in the
> main python-sphinx package which was a good catch... but I think we're losing
> the marking of the files as language specific files.  Taking a look at that.

Is that actually the case? It looks like rpm -ql does not mark the files in the
output -- I tried with another package that contains translations (gnome-vfs2)
and it does not mark the translation files in the output either.

sphinx.lang from the build directory of both the main package and
python-sphinx10 definitely has both the .mo and .js files marked with their
language codes.


> I can look at making a patch for this package after looking at the main package
> if you want.

I can rework the patch for sphinx10 -- there was a patch in 0.6.5 (merged in
0.6.6) that adds the main locale directory, so I just need to refer to it to
find which file to patch. But if you could figure out what's going on with the
language marking that'd be great :)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list