[Bug 587011] Review Request: tboot - uses Intel(R) TXT to perform a measured and verified launch of a kernel/VMM

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 2 18:25:35 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587011

--- Comment #19 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz at redhat.com> 2010-11-02 14:25:34 EDT ---
Package APPROVED from me as well.

rpmlint -v tboot-20101005-1.fc13.src.rpm tboot-20101005-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
tboot-debuginfo-20101005-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm 
tboot.src: I: checking
tboot.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee
OK, no typo here
tboot.x86_64: I: checking
tboot.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pre -> per, ore, pee
OK, as above
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpol
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_relindex
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_writepol
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpol2
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpconf
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_lock
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary parse_err
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_defindex
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpolelt
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_mlehash
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_crtpollist
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcp_readpol
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary acminfo
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tpmnv_getcap
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tb_polgen
tboot.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary txt-stat
It would be nice to get the manual pages sooner or later but it does not block
the package acceptance.
tboot-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list