[Bug 637939] Review Request: rubygem-gdk_pixbuf2 - Ruby binding of GdkPixbuf-2.x
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Nov 4 10:10:10 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637939
Michal Fojtik <mfojtik at redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(mfojtik at redhat.co |fedora-cvs+
|m) |
--- Comment #6 from Michal Fojtik <mfojtik at redhat.com> 2010-11-04 06:10:09 EDT ---
I'm really sorry for the delay, as usually, this package looks perfectly sane
for me:
* Packages that contain Ruby Gems must be called rubygem-%{gemname} where
gemname is the name from the Gem's specification.
[OK]
* The Source of the package must be the full URL to the released Gem archive;
th version of the package must be the Gem's version
[!] Please correct URL to:
http://rubygems.org/downloads/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem
The package must have a Requires and a BuildRequires on rubygems
[OK]
For every dependency on a Gem named gemdep, the package must contain a Requires
on rubygem(%{gemdep}) with the same version constraints as the Gem
[OK]
The %prep and %build sections of the specfile should be empty.
[OK] -> They are not empty, but it's OK for binary extensions
The Gem must be installed into %{gemdir} defined as
%global gemdir %(ruby -rubygems -e 'puts Gem::dir' 2>/dev/null)
[OK]
Architecture-specific content must not be installed into %{gemdir}
[OK]
If the Gem contains binary content (e.g., for a database driver), it must be
marked as architecture specific, and all architecture specific content must be
moved from the %{gemdir} to the [#ruby_sitearch %{ruby_sitearch} directory]
during %install
[OK]
Other things looks good as well. REVIEW+
(Please correct that URL before importing this gem into git)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list