[Bug 634911] Review Request: nodejs - Evented I/O for v8 JavaScript

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634911

--- Comment #7 from Damian Wrobel <dwrobel at ertelnet.rybnik.pl> 2010-11-04 15:47:53 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> 
> So, upstream is not being very helpful here:
> http://groups.google.com/group/nodejs/browse_thread/thread/12a673a14838aa9a#
> 
> Is this a blocker? Would it make sense to persuade the other package's upstream
> to change their executable name?

It's not a blocker (at least for me) but it would be nice to choose the correct
option to avoid renames in the future.

Optionally, if neither of them are willing to compromise maybe it would be a
good idea to approach it as suggested in [1]? In other words assuming that vast
majority of users will use binaries from distros than from sources it would
become more important to have it consistent between different distros even if
the name will be potentially different then used by the upstream.

References:
[1]. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts#Approaching_Upstream

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.