[Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 5 17:54:46 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2010-11-05 13:54:43 EDT ---
I'm trying to take care of the oldest of the review tickets; I had to learn
about mingw32 before I could look at this.
Outside of the spec having several bits which are unnecessary with modern
Fedora (BuildRoot:, cleaning of buildroot in %install, the entire %clean
section) which you can remove if you like, this package looks fine.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
816b16f18d235ff8ccd40d95fc5b4fad61ae47583e86607932929d70bf1f00fd
dirac-1.0.2.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* version packaged is the same as the native Fedora version.
* package is noarch.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* special mingw32 dependency generators are used.
* final provides and requires are sane:
mingw32(libdirac_decoder-0.dll)
mingw32(libdirac_encoder-0.dll)
mingw32-dirac = 1.0.2-2.fc15
=
mingw32-filesystem >= 62
mingw32-runtime
mingw32(kernel32.dll)
mingw32(libdirac_decoder-0.dll)
mingw32(libdirac_encoder-0.dll)
mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)
mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll)
mingw32(msvcrt.dll)
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no static libraries.
* .dll and .def files in _mingw32_bindir
* .dll.a and .la files in _mingw32_libdir
* dll files are listed explicitly in %files.
* libraries and executables are stripped properly.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list