[Bug 639263] Review Request: erlang-rebar - Erlang Build Tools
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Nov 12 07:22:14 UTC 2010
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639263
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov at gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |652543
Bug 639263 depends on bug 638974, which changed state.
Bug 638974 Summary: Review Request: erlang-protobuffs - A set of Protocol Buffers tools and modules for Erlang applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638974
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Bug 639263 depends on bug 638948, which changed state.
Bug 638948 Summary: Review Request: erlang-getopt - Erlang module to parse command line arguments using the GNU getopt syntax
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638948
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Bug 639263 depends on bug 639291, which changed state.
Bug 639291 Summary: Review Request: erlang-mustache - Mustache template engine for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639291
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Bug 639263 depends on bug 639284, which changed state.
Bug 639284 Summary: Review Request: erlang-neotoma - Erlang library and packrat parser-generator for parsing expression grammars
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639284
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the package-review
mailing list