[Bug 653407] Review Request: rubygem-hashery - A collection of Hash-like classes for Ruby

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Nov 15 19:18:47 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=653407

Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-11-15 14:18:46 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> 
> > ? Scripts under test/
> >   - How can scripts under test/ directory be used? (If some test programs can
> >     be executable, would you do some tests in %check?)
> 
> Well, it's a bit complicated. Tests are written using Lemon framework
> (https://github.com/proutils/lemon https://rubygems.org/gems/lemon). This
> framework has big dependency tree which is not packaged as RPMs. Is this a hard
> require to execute tests? Could we add it in next versions when the tree will
> be at least half-packaged?

- Well, actually it looks somewhat complicated, so I would make %check
  section a blocker for this package (if some simple test method gets
  available (in the future), please consider to add it in %check)


----------------------------------------------------------
   This package (rubygem-hashery) is APPROVED by mtasaka
----------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list