[Bug 226419] Merge Review: sip

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Nov 16 23:31:29 UTC 2010


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226419

Garrett Holmstrom <gholms at fedoraproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #1 from Garrett Holmstrom <gholms at fedoraproject.org> 2010-11-16 18:31:27 EST ---
Below are the issues I found.  I will attach a full review shortly.

- License field in spec is correct
  sipgen/parser.c is GPLv3+ with exceptions
  sipgen/parser.h is GPLv3+ with exceptions

A quick IRC discussion indicated that this likely needs to appear in the
License field somewhere.  I'm hoping spot gets back to me for confirmation
about it to be sure, though perhaps it would be better to just ask legal to be
extra certain.

- License files installed when any subpackage combination is installed
  sip-macros package does not pull in license files

It looks like you create macros.sip yourself based on the program's API
version.  What license does it have?  Can you include that license along with
the sip-macros package?

- Sources match upstream unless altered to fix permissibility issues
  Upstream MD5:  No longer on upstream's server
  Your MD5:      0a591ef6e59aa16e56822d3eb9fe21b8  sip-4.10.5.tar.gz

Unfortunately, upstream seems to clean out old tarballs quite frequently.  I
wouldn't block the review because of that, though.

- Each %files section contains %defattr
  The python3 packages lack %defattr macros

Please add %defattr macros to the python3 packages' %files sections.

I hope that helps!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.



More information about the package-review mailing list